Ali vs Hogan Part 10: Ali Files Motion Opposing Frosh & Hogans' Motions To Dismiss

Previous posts in this series:

Next post in this series:

 

Today my legal team responded to the Hogan and Frosh's latest Motions to Dismiss. In this motion, we argue that:

  1. I do not need to, and in fact cannot, submit a bid.
  2. The Governor cannot interpret away Section B.
  3. Section C is independently unconstitutional
  4. The Executive Order is unconstitutionally void for vagueness even under the Governor’s interpretation.
  5. My claim is not barred by the 11th amendment to the Constitution
  6. Section B violates the First Amendment.
  7. Section B is void for vagueness.
  8. The Attorney General is a proper defendant.


Our motion is shown below.

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

Freedom2Boycott defends the 1st Amendment right to boycott, including the boycott of Israel known as BDS. Click to help! Find an Event

connect

get updates