Ali vs Hogan Part 11: Frosh Responds to Ali's Latest Motion

Previous posts in this series:

Today Attorney General Brian Frosh responded to my previous filing with a seventeen-page motion opposing it. In his motion, he argues that:

  1. The C certification, on its face and as applied, is constitutional because it only prohibits one form of national-origin discrimination.
  2. The C certification is not void for vagueness.

You can read Frosh's motion below.

 

Now we wait on the Judge's ruling on the Motion to Dismiss. It might come in a matter of days. Or it might come in a matter of months. We have no clue.

The lockdown caused by the Coronavirus is likely to lengthen the duration we will have to wait for any interim and final decisions in this case.

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

Freedom2Boycott defends the 1st Amendment right to boycott, including the boycott of Israel known as BDS. Click to help! Find an Event

connect

get updates